Tort Reform

Florida Statute 768.0427 – Orders, Articles, and Lectures Interpreted by Aaron Proulx, Esq.

Court Orders

Court Orders Interpreting Florida Statute 768.0427

When Section 768.0427 first passed, the only legal discussion focused on its retroactivity. Over time, courts across Florida began issuing more substantive rulings on how this law applies in practice. This section highlights key orders that shape the current legal landscape around Tort Reform and how it affects medical discovery and financial disclosures.

Initially, the only orders interpreting Section 768.0427 were regarding its retroactivity. Recently there have been a plethora of orders that substantively interpret the statute.

This section will feature selected trial court orders that clarify key provisions of Florida’s Tort Reform law, including:

  • Retroactivity of the statute

  • Burden of proof regarding reasonableness of medical bills

  • Discoverability of insurance contracts

  • Admissibility of provider contracts and reimbursement rates

  • Impact of Letters of Protection (LOPs) and account receivable sales

Court orders with summaries and downloadable PDFs will be added here as they become available.

Letters of Protection - Orders on Interpretation

Court orders addressing the interpretation of Letters of Protection under the statute.

HB 837 Retroactivity – Wave 1

Early court orders interpreting provisions of Florida’s tort reform legislation.

Published Articles

Florida Personal Injury Magazine Series by Aaron Proulx, Esq.

Within a year of opening The Doctor’s Lawyer, PLLC, Florida Tort Reform became law — Section 768.0427. At the time, there were no court decisions interpreting the statute. Aaron Proulx, Esq. dedicated countless hours to studying its language and potential applications, and published a seven-part article series in Florida Personal Injury Magazine offering guidance and interpretation. More articles to follow.

Article #1 – Overview of the Statute

Introduces a 3-tiered strategy responding to Tort Reform and outlines key statutory provisions with practical tips for PI firms and medical providers.

Article #2 – How the Definition of “LOP” Helps PI Firms and Medical Providers

Explains how to avoid triggering disclosure requirements by redefining financial agreements and removing LOP language.

Article #3 – Understanding the Distinctions Between Subsections (2)(a) and (2)(b)

Clarifies the difference between satisfied and unsatisfied medical bills and how each affects admissible evidence.

Article #4 – How Subsection (2)(e) May Prevent the Jury from Seeing Health Insurance Reimbursement Rates

Details a legal strategy using protective orders to block defense discovery of reimbursement contracts.

Article #5 – Tort Reform Is NOT a General Cap on Damages

Dispels the myth that Tort Reform limits all damages and warns attorneys against undervaluing cases.

Article #6 – The Price of the Sale of an Account Receivable Is Not a Cap on Damages, Is Not Admissible, and Is Not Discoverable

Analyzes why sales prices don’t satisfy medical bills and are excluded from jury consideration unless tied to an LOP.

Article #7 – The Absurd “Burden-Shift-Scare” in the Trial Courts Appears to Be Over

Breaks down recent conflicting court orders and explains why the majority view rejects the idea of shifting the burden of proof.

Any Questions?

Frequently Asked Questions

We have been leading in this niche area of law since 2008. We take pride in the strong relationships that we have built.

We are uniquely qualified to represent medical providers who treat patients in personal injury litigation.

To schedule a consultation, please fill out the form or contact us by phone or email.  We look forward to working with you.

We never charge for initial consultations.

Schedule For

Consultation

Integrity. Professionalism. Expertise.

Schedule a Consultation Today

Contact Us

Hours of Operation

© 2025 All rights reserved. The Doctor’s Lawyer. Privacy Policy.